Emanuele Aliberti

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Emanuele Aliberti commented  · 

    I was referring to a feature similar to the basic versiong in CMIS repositories. Versioning can be enabled/disabled per file. It is not available for folders, but only for files("documents"). When it is enabled, you store as many revisions of a file as you like. By default, the most recent (or "current" one) is shown. You can remove old versions.

    See a more formal definition in CMIS spec. 1.0:

    http://docs.oasis-open.org/cmis/CMIS/v1.0/os/cmis-spec-v1.0.html#_Toc243905415

    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 
  6. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Emanuele Aliberti commented  · 

    I was asked if it was possible to create such limited administrator-like users, from the CIO of a company who has some co-workers to whom he does not want to delegate full SG queue management, but just let them review the quarantine and the retry queue, to report back to him about what they found. There is no such a role in current SG release.

    An ACL system would probably be more appropriate for the task, but just limiting existing roles could probably be easier and less expensive to implement for Alt-N in a future release of Security Gateway.

    Thanks for your reply.

    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 
  7. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 
  10. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 
  11. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Emanuele Aliberti shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base