Michel

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hello Michel,

    Per feature whitelists will be considered for future versions. In the meantime there is a potential work around which I believe has already been shared with you, but I’ll share it for the benefit of everyone.

    As a short term work around, you can use a custom SIEVE script for the SPF test. You will need to disable the built-in test, and replace it with something like.

    require [“securitygateway”,“reject”,“fileinto”,“envelope”];

    if not ip :is [“80.168.44.51”, “195.8.69.18”, “213.253.3.180”]
    {
    // cut paste text of system generated sieve script here
    if allof(not whitelisted,not auth “succeeded”,not ip “des”) {
    if lookup “spf” “fail” {
    fileinto “spam”;
    }
    if lookup “spf” “softfail” {
    spamscore “2.0”;
    }
    }

    }

    Thanks,

    Arron

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michel commented  · 

    Hi Arron,

    There is not an actual section called EXCLUDE MESSAGES FROM WHITELISTED IP ADDRESSES - just "Exclude messages from whitelisted senders".

    If that is what you are referring to, then that is what I refer to in my Point (c) in the original post. The problem with that is that the IP and Hostnames whitelists are whitelists which tell SG : do NOT do any anti-spam checking on this IP/hostname, so, Yes, it means emails from a whitelisted IP/Hostname do NOT go through SPF checking, but it also means the same emails do NOT go through any of the other anti-spam checks. Results - hundreds of emails that have stacked up on the backup MX queue get delivered without a single anti-spam check on them !

    What is needed is an exclusion list specifically for SPF checking and no other checks.

    Michel

    Michel shared this idea  · 
  2. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Michel shared this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Michel shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base